Medihelp’s 110th AGM

On 23 June 2016, Medihelp held its 110th Annual General Meeting at the CSIR International Convention Centre in Pretoria. The Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Mr Chris Klopper, presented Medihelp’s annual report for 2015 at the meeting, as well as the Scheme’s financial results achieved in 2015. He focused on Medihelp’s sound financial performance and its healthy risk profile which could be maintained despite many issues impacting on the industry and Medihelp.

Download Medihelp's Annual Report to view it's 2015 performance results:

Voting results

The voting results for the six resolutions announced during the meeting were as follows:

  1. Appointment of Medihelp’s external auditors for 2016
    PricewaterhouseCoopers was appointed as the external auditors for Medihelp for 2016.

  2. Election of two members to the Board of Trustees
    Mr Chris Klopper (left) and Mr Marthinus Visser (right) were re-elected to the Board of Trustees. During the subsequent Board meeting following the AGM, Mr Klopper was once again elected Chairman and Mr Visser Vice-Chairman of the Medihelp Board of Trustees by the Board. We congratulate them and wish them everything of the very best for their next three-year term of office.

  3. Rule amendment as proposed by the Board of Trustees (rule 27)
    The amendment of rule 27 as proposed by the Board of Trustees was approved. The rule deals with the submission of motions by members to be presented to the AGM, and was amended to state that such motions must be seconded by another member. The word “proposals” was also deleted because it is deemed to have the same meaning as “motion” within the context of matters to be voted on at an AGM. Furthermore, all items to be included in the notice for the AGM are now listed separately, making it less complicated.

  4. Rule amendment as proposed by the Board of Trustees (rule 28.2)
    The amendment of rule 28 as proposed by the Board of Trustees was also approved. As in the case of the amendment of rule 27, the word “proposals” was deleted because it is deemed to have the same meaning as “motion” within the context of matters to be voted on at a Special General Meeting.

  5. Motion as proposed by a member (rule 10.8)
    The motion proposed by a member with regard to the amendment of rule 10.8 was not approved.

  6. Motion as proposed by a member (rule 31)
    The motion proposed by a member with regard to the amendment of rule 31 was not approved.

get a quote today

Please complete the fields below and we will phone you back with accredited advice

GO